Attorneys & Firms

The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!

Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!

Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?

All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Back to Top

James Markwith

Client: Prescryptive Health, Inc. ( United State )

Result: Prescryptive Health, Inc. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

James Markwith is the house counsel who represented Prescryptive Health, Inc. in its failed UDRP complaint, which sought to transfer the domain prescriptive.com from its registered owner, Brent Oxley. A three-member panel at the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on October 12, 2025.

Read More...

Bird & Bird

Bird & Bird

Client: TPG Telecom Limited ( Australia )

Result: TPG Telecom Limited found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Bird & Bird is the Australian law firm that represented TPG Telecom Limited, Australia in its failed UDRP complain, which sought to force the transfer of the domain tpg.one from a German company, The Platform Group AG. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking […]

Read More...

Loth & Spuhler

Loth & Spuhler

Client: München Live TV Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG ( Munich, Germany )

Result: München Live TV Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

The German intellectual property firm of LS-IP Loth & Spuhler Intellectual Property Law Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälte mbB represented a regional German broadcast company, München Live TV Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG, in its failed UDRP filing to force a transfer of the domain münchen.tv from its registered owner. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual […]

Read More...

Asist Patent Ltd. Şti.

Asist Patent Ltd. Şti.

Client: Türkiye Varlik Fonu A.Ş. ( Türkiye )

Result: Türkiye Varlik Fonu A.Ş. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Asist Patent Ltd. Şti., based in Türkiye, represented Türkiye Varlik Fonu A.Ş. in its UDRP to grab the domain turkiyesigorta.com from its registered owner. A ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking was handed up against the company on September 24, 2025.

Read More...

Marq Vision, Inc.

Marq Vision, Inc.

Client: Ideas On Board ( Korea )

Result: Ideas On Board found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Marq Vision, Inc. is a U.S. based law firm that represented the Korea-based perfume company, Ideas On Board Corporation, in their failed UDRP bid to secure the domain concreted.com, from its registered owner. A single-member panel handed up the ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on September 24, 2025, finding the domain registration predated the […]

Read More...

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!