RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Rush To File UDRP Earns Promo Printer RDNH On RushOrderTees.co And RushTees.com

Case Number: NAF 2113611

Represented by: Gerben Perrott, PLLC

Printfly Corporation, which operates the promotional goods website, RushOrderTees.com, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its effort to use the UDRP process to hijack the domains rushtees.com and rushordertees.co. PrintFly’s branded company advertises that it is a promotional partner of the Philadelphia 76ers basketball club. In presenting its arbitration […]

Read More...

Indian Company Delivers Itself RDNH Trying To Snag ekart.com

Case Number: D2024-4345

Represented by: Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization has found the India-based delivery company, Instakart Services Private Limited, guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for using the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain ekart.com. Instakart is not related to the U.S.-based Instacart. While the Indian company does have a trademark for […]

Read More...

Domain Name’s Former Owner Found Guilty Of RDNH Trying To Reclaim

Case Number: D2024-3871

Represented by: Cabinet Herrburger

A law firm based in France has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for attempting to use the UDRP arbitration process to force the transfer of a domain name it had once owned but let drop. The firm of Arthus Bertrand, which has a subsidiary by the name of A. Augis, had attempted […]

Read More...

Upstart Fintech Company Found Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: NAF 2120196

Represented by: Foley & Lardner LLP

A midwestern upstart fintech company has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its use of the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domain valusync.com. Zelig AI, LLC, which offers a beta app through its website, valusyncit.com, was found guilty of RDNH by a single-member panel of the National […]

Read More...

American Financial Solutions Invests In UDRP, Earns RDNH

Case Number: NAF 2115900

Represented by: Fish & Richardson P.C.

American Financial Solutions, the trade name of North Seattle Community College Foundation, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a panel of the National Arbitration Forum, after filing a UDRP to force the transfer of the domain af-ss.org. American Financial Solutions had argued, as part of its complaint, the domain is confusingly […]

Read More...
1 2 3 68

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!