The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!
Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!
Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?
All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
Client: Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG ( Weingarten, Germany )
Result: Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Otten, Roth, Dobler & Partner GmbH represented Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG, of Weingarten, German, in the company’s effort to secure the domain tox.com using the UDRP process. The case was filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization, which ruled the filing was an attempt at Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. The ruling was handed up […]
Read More...Client: Mind Gym PLC ( London, England, United Kingdom )
Result: Mind Gym PLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
The law firm of Lewis Silkin LLP represented Mind Gym PLC, of London, United Kingdom, in the company’s effort to acquire the domain mindgym.com from an Irish publishing concern. The case was presented before a sole panelist of the World Intellectual Property Organization. The panelist handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on […]
Read More...Client: Candy Cloud IP LLC ( Machesney Park, Illinois, United States )
Result: Candy Cloud IP LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
The firm of Williams McCarthy LLP represented Candy Cloud IP LLC in the company’s effort to use UDRP to obtain the domain candycloud.com. The case was filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization, which issued its ruling of RDNH against Candy Cloud on November 14, 2022, only four months after the company had secured a […]
Read More...Client: Build A Rocket Boy Games Ltd. ( United Kingdom )
Result: Build A Rocket Boy Games Ltd. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Marks & Clerk Solicitors, of the United Kingdom, represented Build A Rocket Boy Games Ltd., also of the United Kingdom, in its effort to transfer the domain buildarocket.com from the German esports advertising company, Build A Rocket, GmbH. The case was filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization, where a single-member panel found Reverse Domain […]
Read More...Client: Inversiones MCN S.A.S. ( Bogata, Columbia )
Result: Inversiones MCN S.A.S. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
The Columbia office of Holland & Knight LLC represented the Bogata-based Inversiones MCN S.A.S. in its effort to take habi.com from its owner. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found Inversiones MCN S.A.S. guilty of RDNH on October 20, 2022, for its UDRP filing.
Read More...