RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Airpet Animal Transport, Inc. is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #23

Represented by: Mark W. Good of Terra Law LLP, California

PetExpress.com – The Complaintant is Airpet Animal Transport, Inc. represented by Mark W. Good of Terra Law LLP, California, USA. They have been labeled a “Reverse Domain Name Hijacker”.

Read More...

Sustainable Forestry Management Limited is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #22

Represented by: general counsel, Mr. Eric Bettelheim

Gtms.com – The Complainant is Sustainable Forestry Management Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, with its principal place of business in London, United Kingdom. The Complainant is represented by its general counsel, Mr. Eric Bettelheim. They have been labeled a “Reverse Domain Name Hijacker”.

Read More...

City of Paris, France is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case # 21

Represented by:

parvi.org  – found for the complainant in 2009 but in 2012 the courts rules that the City of Paris, France was guilty of “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” in a landmark case that resulted in a $125,000 judgement against the city.

Read More...

Wall-Street.com, LLC is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case # 20

Represented by: Flint IP Law, United States

WallStreet.com – The Complainant is Wall-Street.com, LLC of Florida, United States of America (the “United States” or “US”), represented by Flint IP Law, United States. They have been labeled a “Reverse Domain Name Hijacker”.

Read More...

Tarheel Take-Out, LLC is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #19

Represented by:

Takeout.com – Complainant is Tarheel Take-Out, LLC of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America (“U.S.”), represented internally. They have been labeled a “Reverse Domain Name Hijacker”.

Read More...
1 49 50 51 52 53 55

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!