Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: D2022-4130
Represented by: Talal Abu Ghazaleh Legal
A developer of mall properties across the Middle East has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after attempting to gain the transfer of the domains matajer.net and matajer.com, in two separate UDRP cases before the World Intellectual Property Organization, D2022-4130 and D2022-4129, respectively. Both domains are currently owned by Ayman Bajnaid, a resident […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-3862
Represented by: Promark IP Law Firm
A French beauty supply company, operating on the domain BeautyGarden.com, has been scarred with a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after attempting to transfer the domain BeautyGarde.com from a U.S.-based beauty supply company. The French company, Sothys Auriac, of Auriac, France, was represented by Promark IP Law Firm, and holds numerous trademarks for the phrase, […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-3270
Represented by: Otten, Roth, Dobler & Partner GmbH
Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG, an industrial tooling company based in Weingarten, Germany, has been ruled a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker after attempting to transfer the domain tox.com using a UDRP filing. A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up its ruling on November 23, 2022. Tox Pressotechnik, which serves the sheet […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-3598
Represented by: Lewis Silkin LLP
A corporate consultancy, based in the United Kingdom, which portrays itself as using psychology-based behavior science to help drive culture and well-being, has been hit with a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for abusive use of the UDRP administrative process. The company, Mind Gym PLC, with offices in London and New York City, sought […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-3368
Represented by: Williams McCarthy LLP
A flavored-coffee company, operating under the name Candy Cloud IP, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for attempting to grab the domain candycloud.com by using the UDRP process. The domain is owned by Mike Morgan, of Canada, although the domain, itself, is privacy protected. The case was filed with the World Intellectual […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
