Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: NAF 2143814
Represented by: Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP
An Idaho-based medical spa has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after using the UDRP process to attempt a transfer of the domain name renewcda.com from its owner, based in neighboring Washington state. A three-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum found Renu Medispa, LLC, which was represented by counsel, could not establish even […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2147139
Represented by: Rosaleen Chou of Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
Veracyte, Inc., VCYT in the NASDAQ exchange, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum, after attempting to use the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain name GenomeDX.com from its current registrant. The respondent in the case did not reply to the […]
Read More...Case Number: D2025-0784
Represented by: Novagraaf France
Lacking proper foundation, Cosmetic Research Group, France, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for attempting to use the UDRP process to hijack the domain name soskin.com from its U.S.-based owner, Robert Soskin. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization, with Andrew D.S. Lothian as panelist, handed up a ruling of […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2145226
Represented by: Aaron M. Arce Stark
The Illinois-based towing service, S & S Towing, Inc., has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum after using the UDRP process to attempt the transfer of the domain sstowing.com. Panelist Alan M. Limbury found the company had no distinctive name, no name recognition and […]
Read More...Case Number: WIPO D2025-0430
Represented by: Shannon Avocats
Cassy SAS, a French company specializing in high-end shoes, handbags and accessories, primarily for women, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after trying to use the UDRP process to impel a transfer of the domain cassy.com, which was originally registered in 1998. For its part, Cassy SAS has been operating on the […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
