Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: NAF 2181089
Represented by: Renee Reuter at Armstrong Teasdale LLP
A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum has handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Centene Corporation, which had filed a UDRP to gain control of the domain fidelisinsurancecompany.com. The sole panelist was Alan Limbury. Mr. Limbury handed up his ruling against Centene on October 30, 2025, noting Centene’s trademarks for […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2179695
Represented by: Mari-Elise Paul of McBrayer PLLC
A sole panelist ruling for the National Arbitration Forum has handed up a determination of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Pixels.com, LLC, which had filed a UDRP to force the transfer of the domain metalposter.com. Pixels.com owns the domain metalposters.com, but not the singular form. The Honorable Neil Brown handed up his ruling against Pixels.com […]
Read More...Case Number: D2025-2151
Represented by: Amica Law LLC, Singapore
A Singapore-based subsidiary of a Japanese company that makes electrical metering systems for the utility industry has been founded guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. A three member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up a ruling against Edmi Limited, which had filed a UDRP to acquire a transfer of the domain name […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2175369
Represented by: Benjamin W. Janke of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
Louisiana-based charter school, Academy of Collaborative Education, has been handed a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking following its failed bid to use the UDRP process to impel the transfer of the domain aceforasd.com. A sole panelist for the National Arbitration Forum, Karen Bernstein, handed up the RDNH ruling on October 14, 2025.
Read More...Case Number: D2025-3340
Represented by: Carlos Fang, Director
An Australia-based promoter of male strip-tease shows has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its effort to denude the owner of the domain name magicmenlive.com of his digital property. A solo panelist of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up the ruling of RDNH against Magic Men Holdings Pty Ltd, […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
