Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: D2020-0811
Represented by: Sáenz de Santa María Abogados
A Chilean logistics and shipping company has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after filing a UDRP to grab control of the domain gen.com. Agencias Universales S.A., which was represented by the law firm of Sáenz de Santa María Abogados, filed its case against a private owner, from the United States, at the […]
Read More...Case Number: D2020-0595
Represented by: Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
An Israel-based security firm, Cyarx Technologies Ltd., has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a single-member panel at the World Intellectual Property Organization. Cyarx Technologies had filed a UDRP with WIPO on March 10, 2020, against a private owner, Taylor Robinson, from the United States, in an effort to gain control of […]
Read More...Case Number: D2020-0948
Represented by: Self / Brian Grasso
The owner of a Seattle-based winery and tasting room has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in its attempt to grab the domain houseofpagne.com from a former business associate. Structure Cellars, LLC had filed its complaint, without the aid of counsel, on April 16, 2020, against private owner, Carolyn Holt, who described herself […]
Read More...Case Number: D2020-0591
Represented by: Tucker Arensberg, P.C.
A Pennsylvania winery, Schoffstall Farm, LLC, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after attempting to use the UDRP process to obtain the domain name, springgate.com, from its current owner, whois listed as privacy protected, but who has owned the domain since 2006. Schoffstall Farm, represented by the law firm of Tucker Arensberg, P.C., […]
Read More...Case Number: FA2003001889900
Represented by: Nicholas C. Katsoris
A three-member panel at the National Arbitration Forum has found New York’s famed D’Agostino Supermarket chain guilty of attempted reverse domain name hijacking. The panel handed up its decision after D’Agostino’s parent company, D’Agostino Markets, Inc., filed a UDRP to get a transfer of the domain dagostino.com, which was originally registered in 1996. The current […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
