RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: Case #29

Represented by: Peter G. Nikolai, of Nikolai & Mersereau, P.A., Minnesota

SFM.com – Complainant is State Fund Mutual Insurance Co. represented by Peter G. Nikolai, of Nikolai & Mersereau, P.A., Minnesota, USA The Panel finds “Complainant has engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.”

Read More...

Tiny Prints Inc. is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #27

Represented by: CitizenHawk, Inc., California

TinyPrint.com – Complainant is Tiny Prints, Inc. (“Complainant”), represented by CitizenHawk, Inc., California, USA “Complaint was brought in bad faith and that, accordingly, Complainant has attempted to engage in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking”.

Read More...

AINS, INC. is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #26

Represented by: Janice W. Housey of Symbus Law Group, LLC, Virginia

eCase.com - AINS, INC.(“Complainant”), represented by Janice W. Housey of Symbus Law Group, LLC, Virginia, USA. The panel concludes that the Complaint was brought in bad faith in an attempt at Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Read More...

Coöperatie Univé U.A. is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #25

Represented by: Novagraaf Nederland B.V., Netherlands

Unive.com – Complainant is Coöperatie Univé U.A. of Arnhem, Netherlands, represented by Novagraaf Nederland B.V., Netherlands. “Given the circumstances, the Panel finds that the Complaint was brought in bad faith, in an attempt at Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, and constitutes an abuse of the administrative proceeding”.

Read More...

Personally Cool Inc. is a Reverse Domain Name Hijacker

Case Number: Case #24

Represented by:

ColdFront.com – Complainant is Personally Cool Inc. (“Complainant”), New York, USA. They have been labeled a “Reverse Domain Name Hijacker”.

Read More...
1 22 23 24 25 26 29

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!