RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Citybankonline.com Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: FA1406001564337

Represented by: Kristi Dent of Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, Texas USA

City Bank v. Domain Admin / Inavit, Inc. Claim Number: FA1406001564337 CITY BANK (not CitiBank) whose site is CityBankOnline.com and CityBankTexas.com, represented by Kristi Dent of Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated, Texas, USA was just found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). The domain in question was CityBank.com. The three member panel UDRP panel of Fernando […]

Read More...

Dealhunter A/S of Denmark Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2014-0766

Represented by: Aumento, Denmark

A three member UDRP panel has found Dealhunter A/S of Frederiksberg, Denmark, represented by Aumento, Denmark guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain name DealHunter.com The domain holder was represented by Ari Goldberger and Jason Schaeffer of ESQwire.com The domain name was registered in 1998. The Complainant was incorporated in 2007 and first […]

Read More...

Sin Spirits LLC found Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: FA1405001561750

Represented by: George M. Dipp, Texas

Sin Spirits LLC v. H. Peters – Claim Number: FA1405001561750 Sin Spirits LLC represented by George M. Dipp, Texas has been found Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) making it the third RDNH ruling of the day which must be a record, on the domain name SinVodka.com Respondent registered the disputed domain name on […]

Read More...

Inbay Limited of London Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2014-0096

Represented by: Keystone Law, United Kingdom

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2014-0096 Inbay Limited of London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”), represented by Keystone Law, United Kingdom has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain name inbay.com which was registered back on December 11, 1998. The trademark which inBay Limited of London […]

Read More...

Gold Coast Tourism Corporation Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1733

Represented by: Pod Legal, Australia

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1733 Tourism group guilty of trying to hijack domain name from Digimedia. Gold Coast Tourism Corporation Ltd. has been found guilty of reverse domain name hijacking in a UDRP over the domain name GoldCoast.com. The case was filed against Digimedia, which was represented by John Berryhill. The complainant, a non-profit that promotes the […]

Read More...
1 42 43 44 45 46 55

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!