RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Cobb International Of South Africa Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1997

Represented by: DM Kisch Inc., South Africa

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1997 Cobb International (Pty) Limited of Wynberg, Sandton, South Africa, represented by DM Kisch Inc., South Africa. has been found  Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain names cobbamerica.com and cobbq.com The Complainant contends that the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trade […]

Read More...

RPG Life Sciences Ltd. of Mumbai Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-2094

Represented by: Anand & Anand, India

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-2094 RPG Life Sciences Ltd. of Mumbai, India, represented by Anand & Anand, India has just been found Guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain RpgLife.com by a one memberUDRP Panel. The domain name was registered back  on October 28, 2005 Despite generating some $47 Million in revenue […]

Read More...

Aero Club of New Delhi, India Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1656

Represented by: Lall & Sethi Advocates, India

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1656 Aero Club of New Delhi, India, represented by Lall & Sethi Advocates, India was found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) by a one person UDRP WIPO panel on the generic domain name Woodland.com Aero Club operates under the domain name woodlandworldwide.com which they registered in 2002 and tried to […]

Read More...

Timbermate Products Pty Ltd Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1603

Represented by: K & L Gates LLP, Australia

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1603 Timbermate Products Pty Ltd of Nunawading, Victoria, Australia, represented by K & L Gates LLP, Australia has just been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain name Timbermate.com The one member panel of Tony Willoughby gives an excellent recap of UDRP decisions where RDNH was found […]

Read More...

Cairns Airport Pty Ltd of Queensland, Australia, Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: DAU2013-0023

Represented by: McCullough Robertson Lawyers, Australia

WIPO Domain Name Decision: DAU2013-0023 Cairns Airport Pty Ltd of Cairns, Queensland, Australia, represented by McCullough Robertson Lawyers, Australia has been found GUILTY of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on two domain names owned by two different owners; cairnsairportparking.com.au (first domain name) and airportparkingcairns.net.au (second domain name) “Paragraph 15(e) of the Rules provides that, if “after […]

Read More...
1 43 44 45 46 47 55

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!