RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Australian Company’s UDRP ‘Bricked’ By RDNH Ruling

Case Number: D2025-1881

Represented by: Bennett Litigation and Commercial Law

An Australian company specializing in commercial masonry products has been found guilty of abusing the UDRP process to impel a transfer of the domain tyrone.com from a domain investor. Corcreevy Pty Ltd filed a complaint stating it trades under the name Tyrone Group, and has done so since 2014. The domain, a common given name […]

Read More...

Brazilian Company Stoned By RDNH Trying To Grab Topaz.com

Case Number: D2025-2459

Represented by: Tozzini Freire (Advogados)

A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed a Brazilian financial technology company a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for its effort to use the UDRP process to hijack the domain name, topaz.com, which was registered more than two decades before accrued trademark rights in the mark. Those trademarks, registered between 2020 […]

Read More...

Texas Company On The Ropes For RDNH

Case Number: NAF 2160517

Represented by: Sonia V. Junfin

A small company in Eagle Pass, Texas, Empire Industrial Park LLC, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its attempt to use the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain empireindustrialpark.com from its current owner, Empire Industrial Park, based outside of Seattle, in Everett, Washington. The Texas company […]

Read More...

Legacy Tech Company Slapped With Fresh RDNH After Failed UDRP

Case Number: D2025-2137

Represented by:

An IT services company that claims to have existed since the early 1990’s has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its use of the UDRP process to try to grab the domain advanced2000.com. The company, Advance 2000, Inc., has a 2011 trademark on the word mark “ADVANCE 2000”, claiming a […]

Read More...

Medical Software Firm Slapped With RDNH Trying To Steal Family Domain

Case Number: NAF 2162186

Represented by: Isabelle Jung Greenberg

A London-based medical software company has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with a UDRP complaint it had filed to gain control of the domain leah.ai. The company, Contractpod Technologies Ltd., has a UK trademark for the LEAH mark dating to 2018. However, the company did not offer any services related […]

Read More...
1 5 6 7 8 9 79

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!