Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: NAF 2164205
Represented by: Lyndon Cook, Jr.
A three-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum has handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against a Utah company that attempted to use a 2025 trademark registration to justify the transfer of a domain originally registered in the 1990’s, movi.com. Panelists Alan L. Limbury, Steven M. Levy and Sandra J. Franklin handed […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2166234
Represented by: Wali U. Raja of Jarrals Law
An e-cigarette brand marketing products under the label “Munchies”, and itself named Munchies LLC, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a panel of the National Arbitration Forum. The lone panelist on the case, Alan L. Limbury, found there was no chance the domain had been registered in bad faith, given the […]
Read More...Case Number: D2025-2598
Represented by: Sideman & Bancroft LLP
Eetho Brands, Inc., which started selling energy supplement drinks in 2020, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a one-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization, following the company’s use of the UDRP process to deprive a domain owner of their property interests in the domain dosedaily.com. Panelist Matthew Kennedy handed […]
Read More...Case Number:
Represented by: Sierra IP Law, PC
A California company specializing in the placement and operation of leased telescopes for astronomical observation has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, after a failed UDRP complaint to gain control of the domain sro.com. A one-person panel at the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up the ruling against Sierra Remote Observatories LLC, which […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2163671
Represented by: Kim Boyle of Richard Law Group, Inc.
Chai Research Corp. has been found guilty by a one-person panel of the National Arbitration Forum of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, after filing a failed UDRP action to grab the domain name, chai.new. The panelist, Eduardo Magalhães Machado, handed up his ruling on August 7, 2025, noting the respondent company was also using the term […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
